
Warming, not cooling: ocean heat content
One the myths peddled by the denial machine is that there has been a pause in warming.
Indeed, Britain’s “nuttiest weather forecaster” Piers Corbyn is predicting a mini ice age. Jo Nova looked at the last year years of temperature data and concluded the world might have entered a cooling phase.
Of course, such claims are completely divorced from reality. Two recent studies and Australia’s experience over summer offer conclusive proof the planet is warming, and that we’re living in a changed climate.
No doubt many of you have already seen the study of ocean warming by Balmaseda, Trenberth, and Källén (2013) published in Geophysical Research Letters (DOI: 10.1002/grl.50382)
The elusive nature of the post-2004 upper ocean warming has exposed uncertainties in the ocean’s role in the Earth’s energy budget and transient climate sensitivity. Here we present the time evolution of the global ocean heat content for 1958 through 2009 from a new observational-based reanalysis of the ocean. Volcanic eruptions and El Niño events are identified as sharp cooling events punctuating a long-term ocean warming trend, while heating continues during the recent upper-ocean-warming hiatus, but the heat is absorbed in the deeper ocean. In the last decade, about 30% of the warming has occurred below 700 m, contributing significantly to an acceleration of the warming trend. The warming below 700 m remains even when the Argo observing system is withdrawn although the trends are reduced. Sensitivity experiments illustrate that surface wind variability is largely responsible for the changing ocean heat vertical distribution.
Put simply, global warming has been accelerating: 90% of global warming has been going into the oceans, heating them considerably.
Of course, there is the recent Marcott et.al paper looking at the last 11,500 years of temperature anomalies:

A new hockey stick
While Australia has just experienced the “Angry Summer“:
The oceans are warming at an alarming rate; temperature records are being smashed not just in Australia, but across the world; the present warming trend is unlike anything we’ve seen in thousands of years.
Of course, the denial machine has gone into overdrive ever more desperate attempts to cast doubt on the science.
Thus we’re left with a stark choice; accept the science, or believe the entire scientific community is lying.
Three graphs showing conclusively that or globe is overheating not cooling? I’ve seen a site with no less than ten such graphs here :
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/10/15/1014151/ten-charts-that-make-clear-the-planet-just-keeps-warming/
Of course, the Human Induced Rapid Global Overheating Deniers have their graphs falsely claiming otherwise too but on closer inspection – such as the one done here :
http://grogsgamut.blogspot.de/2013/02/andrew-bolt-trends-towards-dodgy-graphs.html
these turn out to be dodgy as all hell. Deliberately misleading, cherry-picked and poorly and incorrectly labelled.
You probably already know but as this youtube clip – 24 – “Global warming has stopped? Again??” by potholer54 (whose series on this issue is exemplary) – shows :
the whole “No further global overheating” crock seems to have been pulled from the backside of some British journalist named Rose who made up his own analysis totally ignoring what the experts including at the Met office actually said.
Thanks for this – much appreciated.
No worries! 🙂
i am fascinated by the complete doubling down of denier’s on the idea that the whole Global warming hoax is just about dead. The arctic is just in a melting phase with the AMO, and the extra melting is because of soot. Anatarctica is GAINING ice so the tota at the poles is perfectly normal. Hansen is CONSTANTLY rewiring past temps to be lower and current temps to be higher. the 17 years of no warming are pretty much the last neil in the coffin, and in the next few years when temps refuse to rise scientists will stat jumping ship and realize that either there is NO substantial forcing of water vapor so CO2 doubling is only .7C or some other.
of curse they have been saying variations of this for the past 4 years that I have ben paying attention. I am impressed with how easily they dusted off the arctic debacle, when ALL of them claimed 2007 was a fluke.
My favorite is SUYTS as he is polite and while an ideological zealot at least tries to make argumnets that purport to be rational.
Its only a matter of time – there are some early indications they are dusting off the old John Holdren / James Hansen models which showed increased CO2 could trigger a cooling trend, so they can flip back to global cooling scares. Holdren has been collecting splinters in his butt for at least the last 30 years on this issue, trying to cover every possibility with his predictions – hence his failed “global climate disruption” meme.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100054012/global-warming-is-dead-long-live-er-global-climate-disruption/
More on “Global Climate Disruption”:-
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/16/white-house-global-warming-global-climate-disruption/
In a 2007 presentation, Holdren suggested a similar phrase change — “global climatic disruption.”
The explanation he gave last week was that the impact from greenhouse gas emissions covers a broad “disruption” of climate patterns ranging from precipitation to storms to hot and cold temperatures. Those changes, he said, affect the availability of water, productivity of farms, spread of disease and other factors.
He’s not the first scientist to publicly veer away from “global warming.” NASA published an analysis on its website in 2008 explaining that it avoids the term because temperature change “isn’t the most severe effect of changing climate.”
In other words they want to cover everything – though still all our fault of course.
Any day now
Where is this CO2 causes global cooling paper?
A link to Dames Delingpole followed by a link to Fox News? You’ve given the game away Eric, you’re clearly a Poe.
Note also Eric’s rehash of the ‘Scientists were predicting an Ice Age!’ meme, despite having been corrected on this point several times. Until he can behave like an adult and acknowledge evidence which challenges his narrative, he should be ignored.
When it comes to Erric, every day is Groundhog Day.
What date does Tony the Weatherboy predict the arctic will recover again? http://www.skepticalscience.com/feb-2013-sea-ice-spiral.html
Delingpole? Watch him drop to the canvas with one punch. This is must viewing.
He complained of “intellectual rape” because he couldn’t respond coherently to one question. He couldn’t credibly use “it’s a conspiracy” on national television – that message is only for his gullible followers. Instead he falls silent.
Tony, it is to fool the public into thinking that is the case. keep repeating it,
read animal farm by Orwell
The IPCC keeps getting it right. “In 1990, climate scientists from around the world wrote the First Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It contained a prediction of the global mean temperature trend over the 1990–2030 period that, halfway through that period, seems accurate. This is all the more remarkable in hindsight, considering that a number of important external forcings were not included. So how did this success arise? In the end, the greenhouse-gas-induced warming is largely overwhelming the other forcings, which are only of secondary importance on the 20-year timescale.”
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v3/n4/full/nclimate1763.html
Buh, bye, deniers…
Leaving aside the third graph, which I assume you included as a joke, given that Australia is a tiny portion of the global surface, and the North this year is experiencing an extreme winter:-
RE the second graph, Marcott himself admitted that his post 1800s reconstruction is “not robust”, because the number of proxies thins out towards the end – so the spike at the end could be an artefact.
RE the first graph, it looks like Trenberth’s analysis is in a little trouble. Early days, because the Trenberth paper is very recent, but there’s an excellent writeup on some of the issues on WUWT:-
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/26/trenberth-still-searching-for-missing-heat/
So still no compelling evidence that the world is warming. More importantly, those pesky surface thermometers refuse to budge – and none of your climate heroes seem willing to put their reputations on the line with a prediction of when the “warming trend” in surface temperatures will resume.
fox news, the daily telegraph and watt the F**ck, great sources, any science?
they have been claiming that the hoax is over for the past four years, nothing will change except their numbers which are evaporating much like the Arctic
Yawn.
Wake me up when you have a credible source.
p.s.
I still have $10 riding on a record warm year this year (at good odds of 5 to 1)
Let me know when you can match that.
The Arctic ocean temperature is ten degrees warmer than the north atlantic, just looked at that this morning, how does fit into your so called cooling phase?
sorry that was wrong was looking at something else
What is fascinating is the possibility (even if very remote) that the globe may not warm as much as predicted. Just fast forward to 2100 and imagine that global average temperatures are not much warmer than today.
The denialists might feel vindicated when , in actual fact, they would have no right to do so. The only people who could claim vindication would be those true sceptics (i.e. scientists ) who always play by the rules and argue their case on the facts, not on beliefs and distortions (and especially WUWT).
Sorry Eric, the bad news, I am afraid, is that denialists stand no chance of gaining any credit no matter what global temperatures do. Their incoherence, absence of true scepticism, and lack of training make them ineligible for any potential prize at the end of the race. You are no scientist – stick to writing code.
Just a quick heads-up Eric, Anthony Watts is a retired meteorologist. What he doesn’t know about climate change could fill a warehouse. I tell you this because it seems you’ve mistaken him to be a competent scientist who at least has a rudimentary understanding of climate science. Scientist John Abraham offers a brief summary of Anthony’s clownish bungling of climate science in this interview:
http://oilprice.com/Interviews/Real-Pragmatism-for-Real-Climate-Change-Interview-with-Dr.-John-Abraham.html
Be more careful in future. Citing Watts is a sure way to embarrass yourself and guarantee that you won’t be taken seriously.
I still like SciAm banning Watts as spam. Here’s a video of Watts’ 15 minutes of fame, appearing with another famed scientist, Glenn Beck. We’re not going to stand for any liberal facts on this show, no-sirreee-bob. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_0-gX7aUKk&feature=player_embedded#!
Sammy, you give Watts too much credit. He is a retired TV met man, with no tertiary qualifications. He never qualified as a meteorologist, or as anything else for that matter.
He also falsely claims to be AMS certified – and doesn’t mind censoring the facts. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Anthony_Watts
Thanks, Debunker and John. Indeed, I was far too kind.
Yes Sammy, Watts basically just has high school qualifications. Can you imagine if someone with high school maths and physics started telling Stephen Hawking he had completely got the physics of Black Holes wrong? He would be laughed off the planet.
Yet these idiots would rather listen to a Watts, with no formal qualifications, rather than the foremost Climatologists on the planet. Seriously, they need their collective heads read….
I just had a look at the SourceWatch link posted by John above. Watts attended Purdue University from 1975 to 1982, and left without graduating.
7 years and still couldn’t graduate! That doesn’t mean he left because he got bored or some other such excuse. He was probably asked to leave because he was deemed too thick to ever graduate. Keep according him hero status Eric….. That really was a heroic effort!
I haven’t looked at Sourcewatch, but if he was there in 1975 and 1982, he actually spent 8 years not graduating.
Dumb & Dumber! 😀
Eric wrote : “Leaving aside the third graph, which I assume you included as a joke, given that Australia is a tiny portion of the global surface, and the North this year is experiencing an extreme winter.
See there’s an explanation for that extreme winter and its entirely conistent with Global Overheating – the jetstream has slowed because of heat over the Arctic which is heating up much faster than the rest of the planet and this means the jetstream meanders more and takes longer to complete a revolution than previously which means stronger, longer storms. The extra water vapour coming fromthe hotter Arctic and increased melt with consequent larger stretches of open water doesn’t help either because heat drives storms and mor emositure = more precipitation eg. greater snowfall.
Typo & space bar error fixes :
The extra water vapour coming from the hotter Arctic and increased melt with consequent larger stretches of open water doesn’t help either because heat drives storms and more moisture = more precipitation.
(Would love an edit or preview facility here, hint, hint!)
See also :
Global Warming: Winter Weirding clip by Greenman 3610 /Peter Sinclair. In fact, Eric Worrall, I highly recommend you (& everyone else but you especially) watch the whole ‘Climate Denial Crock of the Week’ series that’s part of, think about it and learn. Please?
Please, astrostevo, do not confuse Eric with mechanisms and reasoning. You have to ‘crank’ it up for him to follow, and the message has to come with outstandingly poor layout [Corbyn] or be under a pink portcullis []Monckton].
See also :
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-03-26/northern-blizzards-linked-to-arctic-sea-ice-decline/4594802
Eric Worrell, serious question here, have you actually done *any* research or checked anything you’ve said with even a few minutes online searching before you posted all that stuff that, y’know, simply just isn’t right?
Watts is propaganda. There’s no need to read him. And he’s a eugenicist.
For an intelligent discuss about Marcott 2013 may I suggest:
The two epochs of Marcott
Guest post by Jos Hagelaars.
http://ourchangingclimate.wordpress.com/2013/03/19/the-two-epochs-of-marcott/
The discussion following the post is actually quite good and informative in it’s own right.
Also not to miss is Ms Hot Whopper’s examination of McIntyre and Watt’s vacuum chamber science.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SATURDAY, MARCH 9, 2013
http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/03/watts-is-whopping-crazy-after-marcott.html
Watts is Whopping Mad (Crazy) after Marcott et al – Must be the Heat!
Update 2+ So far there are now {three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve thirteen fourteen (crossed out)} fifteen WUWT protest articles not counting the sleazeball’s (approaching this might even beat the number of protests against the Lewandowsky et al paper). The first few are touched on in this article.
~ ~ ~
Eric this one’s for you:
“Now they are focusing entirely on this century rather than the entirety of the Holocene.
‘If I understand Watts/McIntyre correctly, they are saying that there is an “error” in Marcott et al, which means earth hasn’t been warming after all and we are actually still in the Little Ice Age.”
interesting that the deniers now have no papers to make a case and are entirely devoted to slinging crap at genuine papers, saves time doing research and providing peer reviewed counter science,
Of course they all believe in blog science by your local IT guy is more than worthless,
the rest of us need a panadol after reading their nonsense
.
Eric “Australia is a tiny portion of the global surface, and the North this year is experiencing an extreme winter:-”
what planet is he on ?
One thing that impressed me with the ocean temperatures graphs is the clear cooling of the ocean surface when there was a strong El Niño event in 1998.
The surface of the ocean is warmer now than it was in 1997, so the next strong El Niño is likely to be very hot. And because the water deeper in the ocean is now also warmer, the cooling of the surface may not be so strong.
They may be in overdrive, but no one is paying attention. That sound you can hear? It’s the quiet sobbing of deniers in their bunkers, desperately trying to hide the decline.
denial and conspiracy theory,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh
http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/creeping-communism-agenda-21-and-pm.html
That’s all good and well, but how do the Reptilians from the constellation Draco fit in to all this?
Enki is coming to save them just before the reptilians and the ice age arrive.
no not joking that was a guy called chubb on steve fieldings forum some years ago firm belief. had his bunker ready to wait for enki.
,
Upset him and would post about five pages of glaciers, only those in retreat,
as eric is to wuwt chubb was to iceagenow
only available on way back now
The intellectual death rattle of denierdom, shrieking up is down, won’t change the physics. The world is warming due to manmade CO2 – and we’re not going to enjoy the consequences.
Eric is a classic denier. No amount of evidence is ever going to convince him. Even when the summer Arctic ice is all gone, (probably just a couple of years away now), he will still be bleating about how its all ended up in Antarctica, or that its cyclical and will come back, or some other such rubbish.
A real skeptic would at least admit occasionally that we may have a point. That yes indeed, the loss of Arctic ice is very worrying and may possibly be due to Global Warming, but no, not Eric.
However, given that he is 100% certain that AGW is not happening, I can’t understand why he is unwilling to bet on it. With those sorts of odds, its not a bet, its an investment! The fact he is unwilling to put his money where his mouth is, suggests to me that he is not at all sure that he is correct. In other words, he is a bullshit artist.
Come on Eric, give us an ice recovery prediction! We all need a good laugh!. Put 10 bucks on it at least!
He has already said that if the arctic goes he will change his mind, I fear that by goes he means not even one cubic metre left. will probably hang on until there is not enough left to even cool a drink, but by then watts will have already posted the “its is all in the antarctic on holidays”
Yes John,
It will all depend on what his definition of “ice free” will be. You can immediately assume that he will not accept the scientific definition of ice free, hence giving him plenty of wiggle room. It is fairly obvious that we are dealing with a supremely arrogant individual who will not admit he is wrong unless dragged kicking and screaming.
I’m not holding my breath….
Eric bets against Bloomberg. My money is on Michael. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-26/new-york-state-cites-climate-change-as-risk-to-bond-investors.html
hope you don’t mind, couldn’t resist reposting your comment.
http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=325758#p325758
cheers
Breaking – the next issue of “The Economist”, a major global magazine, carries an article on the slowdown of Global Warming:-
http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21574461-climate-may-be-heating-up-less-response-greenhouse-gas-emissions
(h/t WUWT)
The dyke is crumbling guys – climate “denial” is starting to penetrate MSM in a big way. Your alarmist religion is finished.
The evolution dyke is crumbling guys “evolution denial” is starting to penetrate the MSM in a big way.
your alarmist evolution religion is finished
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-scientists.html
The comparison is stunning
Partial list of Creationist scientists
(past and present)
600+ voting scientists of the Creation Research Society (voting membership requires at least an earned master’s degree in a recognized area of science).
150 Ph.D. scientists and 300 other scientists with masters degrees in science or engineering are members of the Korea Association of Creation Research. The President of KACR is the distinguished scientist and Professor Young-Gil Kim of the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. Ph.D. in Materials Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute / highly distinguished / inventor of various important high-tech alloys.
(Note: The following list is very incomplete. Inclusion of any person on this list is in no way an endorsement, nor does it necessarily indicate anything about their religious beliefs.)
Gerald E. Aardsma (physicist and radiocar
John, unlike some of the others, inside you is a spark of intellectual honesty.
I’m looking forward to discussing this with you after your 2015 ice free prediction fails.
Eric,you have no intellectual honesty at all,and that lack of honesty is copiously documented here.
you may be discussing that sooner than you think
You need to read the entire article. Sigh. Your denial is the thing that is finished. The Economist has also neglected the deep ocean. But, and pay attention, Worrall, the Economist is not a science journal. Oh yes, it’s miles better than Forbes or the Murdoch poodle papers, but it’s not a science journal. Still, it is better than the nutty Weatherboy blog you cherish – which is completely upside down.
I know I’m a fuss pot. I’ll take my science from science journals. And I won’t look for stock tips in the Artificial Intelligence journals.
So, for the Economist, a C+ for science. http://www.skepticalscience.com/no-long-tail-means-climate-sensitivity-is-low.htm
Got that date for arctic ice recovery yet, young Eric?
I think this trumps the Economist. But, hey, what would a climate scientist know about climate? (Snigger.) http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/grl.50382/abstract
Your denial is that the prediction which is in trouble is a surface temperature prediction.
If the models can’t get surface temperature right, then what else are they getting wrong?
If the surface temperature line busts through the bottom of the 95% model prediction of temperature, then its reasonable to conclude the models which produced that prediction are wrong.
Eric, “IF”
GISS
The trend from August 1975 to July 1997 is 0.16ºC/dec, and the trend to August 2012 is 0.17ºC/dec .
The ten years to August 2012 were warmer than the previous 10 years by 0.15ºC, which were warmer than the 10 years before that by 0.17ºC, which were warmer than the 10 years before that by 0.17ºC, and which were warmer than the 10 years before that by 0.17ºC
.
The continuation of the linear trend from August 1975 to July 1997 would have predicted a temperature anomaly in August 2012 of 0.524ºC. The actual temperature anomaly in August 2012 was 0.525ºC.
That is the surface temperature referred to
Eric has no idea of risk assessment. He assumes that if the trend falls outside the 95 percentile band then game over, AGW disproved.
If his doctor initially told him he had a cancer with a 95 percent death rate but then modified his assessment to 85 pc after tests, would he be jumping for joy, shouting ‘whoopee I’m cured’?
What an idiot!
A lot of climate denial actually originated in the MSM, Err-ic. Fabricators of interviews like David Rose and Jonathon Leake,bellicose factually bare ranters like Delingpole,Booker and Bolt and the ‘science’ journalist Jo Nova…and who could ignore the efforts of Murdoch’s OZ wing under Chris Mitchell? Fed by liar for hire Marc Morano and A Watts,the MSM has been pretty hopeless at fact checking these cynics.
shit, just realised that you have only scratched the surface,
heaps more,
It’s happening already….
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/27/arctic-sea-ice-maximum_n_2962908.html
The money quote:
Arctic Sea ice maximum is sixth lowest on record, the 10 lowest sea ice maximums have all occurred over the past 10 years.
Won’t make any difference though to our own Alfred E Neuman, “What me worry”, Eric…
I post this just to hear Eric bleat. It’s music to my ears.http://www.nature.com/news/global-warming-expands-antarctic-sea-ice-1.12709
AGW is an oil scam cooked up by Enron and Gore . Please remember that ALL Americans are on the extreme right by civilised standards.
Enron Also Courted Democrats Washington Post – Kyoto
According to internal Enron documents and the recollections of former employees, Chairman Kenneth L. Lay had the ear of top Democrats in the 1980s and ’90s. He and his colleagues used that access to promote the company’s interests with the Clinton administration and key congressional Democrats.
In a White House meeting in August 1997, for example, Lay urged President Clinton and Vice President Gore to back a “market-based” approach to the problem of global warming — a strategy that a later Enron memo makes clear would be “good for Enron stock.”
On Aug. 4, 1997, Lay and seven other energy executives met with Clinton, Gore, Rubin and other top officials at the White House to discuss the U.S. position at the upcoming conference on global warming in Kyoto, Japan. Lay, in a memo to Enron employees, said there was broad consensus in favor of an emissions-trading system.
Enron officials later expressed elation at the results of the Kyoto conference. An internal memo said the Kyoto agreement, if implemented, would “do more to promote Enron’s business than almost any other regulatory initiative outside of restructuring the energy and natural gas industries in Europe and the United States.”
google the link.
OK I googled ENRON, why did you leave out all of this stuff?
Bush administration and the Enron connection
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bush_administration_and_the_Enron_connection
~ ~ ~
Enron and the Bush administration: kindred spirits in fraud and criminality
By David Walsh | 18 January 2002
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2002/01/enro-j18.html
~ ~ ~
The Enron Collapse And The Bush/Republican Connections !
01-17-2002
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/enron_republican.htm
~ ~ ~
Enron: Patron Saint of Bush’s Fake News
Published: March 20, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/20/arts/20Rich.html?_r=0
~ ~ ~
KEN LAY DESERVED A STATE FUNERAL – 2006
http://mostcorrupt.com/Ken-Lay.htm
~ ~ ~
The Enron Story Everyone Is Missing: The Bush-Ken Lay Connection
May 26, 2006
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20060526_enron_bush_lay/
~ ~ ~
===========================
Oh but this isn’t a blog for crazy conspiracy theories, we were trying to talk climate science and Earth observations, weren’t we?
One directional skepticism equals denial 😉
Enron believed Bush could implement Kyoto better than Gore. They were wrong. The senate voted 95-0 against it.; There was nothing Bush could do.
The Washington Post ain’t no conspiracy feary dudes.
*****
Enron Also Courted Democrats Washington Post – Kyoto
According to internal Enron documents and the recollections of former employees, Chairman Kenneth L. Lay had the ear of top Democrats in the 1980s and ’90s. He and his colleagues used that access to promote the company’s interests with the Clinton administration and key congressional Democrats.
In a White House meeting in August 1997, for example, Lay urged President Clinton and Vice President Gore to back a “market-based” approach to the problem of global warming — a strategy that a later Enron memo makes clear would be “good for Enron stock.”
On Aug. 4, 1997, Lay and seven other energy executives met with Clinton, Gore, Rubin and other top officials at the White House to discuss the U.S. position at the upcoming conference on global warming in Kyoto, Japan. Lay, in a memo to Enron employees, said there was broad consensus in favor of an emissions-trading system.
Enron officials later expressed elation at the results of the Kyoto conference. An internal memo said the Kyoto agreement, if implemented, would “do more to promote Enron’s business than almost any other regulatory initiative outside of restructuring the energy and natural gas industries in Europe and the United States.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A37287-2002Jan12¬Found=true
Washington Post – Kyoto 2
But some business groups — especially those representing alternative energy technologies — praised the president’s plan. “This is a measured, appropriate action plan, given what we know about global warming,” said Terry Thorn, senior vice president of Enron Corp. of Houston.
More than a dozen senior executives representing such companies as Nike Inc., Bechtel Group Inc. and Mitsubishi Motor Corp. have endorsed a newspaper ad running this week that calls for “strong leadership” by the United States on climate change.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/climate/stories/clim102397.htm
This claims, Aloha also and Thanks also to this said Editor, reporter and/or ‘ ‘ scribe ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ wtd ( for SHORT ) ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ WordPress ‘ ‘ for that this i of his/hers said columns for ‘ ‘ wtd ( for SHORT ) ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ WordPress ‘ ‘ on it with it now here STILL recounts also that in this case also, this now here cites also life also even with ” ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ Warming, NOT Cooling: ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ” but then next recounts also that in this case also, this now here cites also life also even with ” ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ Three ( 3 ) ( iii ) Recent Graphs That Conclusively Show The Planet’s Temps Heating Up ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ” for him/herself for him/herself, for ANYONE whosoever accepts also that this even claims also, Aloha also and Thanks also to this said Editor, reporter and/or ‘ ‘ scribe ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ wtd ( for SHORT ) ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ WordPress ‘ ‘ for that this i of his/hers said accounts for ‘ ‘ wtd ( for SHORT ) ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ WordPress ‘ ‘ on it with it now here STILL recounts also that in this case also, this now here cites also life also even with ” ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ Warming, NOT Cooling: ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ” but then next recounts also that in this case also, this now here cites also life also even with ” ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ Three ( 3 ) ( iii ) Recent Graphs That Conclusively Show The Planet’s Temps Heating Up ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ” him/herself for him/herself, for fans, for OUTSIDERS, for readers, for visitors, for others also and even for us, too….
But this even as well claims also, Aloha also and Thanks also to this said Editor, reporter and/or ‘ ‘ scribe ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ wtd ( for SHORT ) ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ WordPress ‘ ‘ for that this i of his/hers said columns for ‘ ‘ wtd ( for SHORT ) ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ WordPress ‘ ‘ on it with it now here STILL recounts also that in this case also, ” ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ Put simply, global warming has been accelerating: 0.9 ( the decimal equivalent for this said amount ) or 9/10 ( the fractional equivalent for this said amount in simplest terms ) of global warming has been going into the oceans, heating them considerably…. ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ” for him/herself for him/herself, for ANYONE whosoever accepts also that this even claims also, Aloha also and Thanks also to this said Editor, reporter and/or ‘ ‘ scribe ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ wtd ( for SHORT ) ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ WordPress ‘ ‘ for that this i of his/hers said accounts for ‘ ‘ wtd ( for SHORT ) ‘ ‘ for ‘ ‘ WordPress ‘ ‘ on it with it now here STILL recounts also that in this case also, ” ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ Put simply, global warming has been accelerating: 0.9 ( the decimal equivalent for this said amount ) or 9/10 ( the fractional equivalent for this said amount in simplest terms ) has been going into the oceans, heating them considerably…. ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ” him/herself for him/herself, for fans, for OUTSIDERS, for readers, for visitors, for others also and even for us, too….