Money masters and global warming video: “Debunking David De Rothschild And The Global Warming Hoax”
Some follow-up material which clearly demonstrates Perth climate sceptic Dr. David Evans is drawing upon conspiracy culture (for background see the post Protocols of the elder climate scientists and banksters):
The above video contains startling echoes of the claims made by David Evans:
- Rothschild family conspiracy theorizing
- It directly references the 1996 documentary “The Money Masters” which Evans appears to be drawing upon
- It states global warming is “hoax”
- The video presents the same objections to the science circulating within the denial community
- It states “agents of the Rothschild” where responsible for the establishment of the League of Nations and the later UN
- It opposes carbon taxes as a “scam”, the same language of Evans and Nova
- It suggests the real agenda of global warming is taxation, a global currency and global government
The video is posterd by YouTube user WAKEUPCALLCHANNEL2. Without doubt Evans is drawing upon the same sources and theories currently circulating within conspiracy culture. The text that accompanies the videos states:
Watch The Money Masters for more information. Watch Global Warming or Global Governance. Research AGENDA 21 and NLE09. Watch Endgame Blueprint for Global Enslavement and The Obama Deception. The Truth shall set you FREE. FREE YOUR MIND FROM THE LIES.
The section of “The Money Masters” that explains the vast “international bankers” theory can be seen below. I suggest browsing the comments section to see how people interpret how the codes words and phrases are interpreted by the audience:
Fighting the wrong war: decoding the work of the deniers will yield greater results
In order to understand the conspiracy theories of the likes of Evans, Monckton et.al. it is vital to bypass the sanitized version of their work that appears in the mainstream media. However, a close reading of all their writing and media performances provides the necessary cues for analysis and reading.
The victory of the denialists can be attributed to a strategic failure: far too much countering the scientific arguments of sceptics such as Evans.
I now believe this has been a deeply flawed strategy: we should have paid far greater attention to their politics and world view. We should have zeroed in on the outrageous conspiracy claims – and the delusional nature – of the sceptics movement. It would have yielded a far greater understanding of the sceptic movement as a whole and informed different approach to countering their claims.
We granted them the label “sceptic” when it should always have been “denier”.
All the energy we spent countering the scientific arguments of Evans, Monckton, Plimer, Singer and the like was perhaps a wasted effort.
Hence their “victory”.
We should be honest with our selves and admit we fought the wrong battle.
It’s time to change our tactics, and time to fight a different battle. It’s also time to set a new victory condition.
What does victory look like?
I suggest it is the side lining and destruction of the climate sceptic movement as a political and cultural force.
[Hat tip reader Skygodsversusearthlings for the first video.]