… or publish them in the peer review literature? Just saying.
(Thought of the day: ToD)
For every Galileo there are at least a thousand Von Danikens.
He’d certainly get more readers if he blogged on WUWT than if he published in Nature.
Yes, because the criteria for good science is page hits…
I doubt Galileo would feel the need. Newton might, though. He went through a very odd phase of paranoia about the scientific establishment and tucked himself away in a garret (read “basement” in the present) to get into some pretty weird shit. He’d be a natural for WUWT and dog-astrology journals.
I think would experience some involuntary conspiracist ideation upon learning of the people in jail for sharing the wrong opinion about WW2 🙂
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.