Things that scare me: redux
How many of readers recall early 2011 when cyclone Yasi struck Brisbane?
At least 35 people died in floods across New South Wales and Queensland. The resulting rains and floods costed the Australian economy approximately $10 billion.
Or the flooding suburbs in Melbourne, which I captured on video. So extreme were these events that it caused one member of the Bureau of Meteorology to exclaim: “We’ve never seen anything like it in Australia”
Perhaps you may recall early 2011 fires raged in Western Australia (Black Sunday), while Sydney experienced a record seven-day heat wave.
Across the globe soaring temperatures saw record rains flood two-thirds of Pakistan, while at the same time fires raged across Russia.
Or perhaps your memory goes back to the 2010 records floods in China killed close to 400 people, destroying 1.3 millions homes and caused $54USD billion in damage?
Perhaps some might remember the fires that ripped through Israel in an event called that nations worst natural disaster in history?
Of course there where the floods in Niger and the record rain in the US that saw Nashville inundated.
Indeed in September 2010 I wrote about the things that scared me about the coming Australian summer:
Thus with 2010 looking like being the hottest year record, I think we should be deeply concerned about the coming bushfire season.
As noted by the IPCC, with rising temperatures Australia could be subjected to more floods and catastrophic fires…I earnestly hope some advanced planning is taking place.
While let me reiterate my concerns for the coming Australian summer of 2012-13.
I’m not claiming any prescience, just noting the obvious fact an increase in CO2 that traps more heat, raises temperatures and fuels more extreme weather events.
It makes sense because the science is pretty fucking solid.
The attribution debate is over
Back in 2010 and early 2011 “sensible” voices cautioned about attributing these events to climate change. This is the so called “attribution” question, and we’re cautioned to not make simple linkages between a flood here and climate change: fair enough.
I recall Michael Tobis writing for the now defunct “Only in it for the gold” asking that very question in 2010 reflecting on the Russian heat wave:
But right now I feel like hazarding a guess. As far as I understand, nothing like this has happened before in Moscow….
…The formerly remarkable heat wave of 2001, then, is “the sort of thing we’ll see more of” with global warming. But it may turn out reasonable, in the end, to say “the Russian heat wave of 2010 is the first disaster unequivocally attributable to anthropogenic climate change.”
Tentative, hedging and qualifying like a good scientist and commentator on this issue should.
Still the blogger Eli at Rabett Run said Michael was asking a “scary question”, noting sardonically:
As Dirty Harry would say, at some point the bunnies have to ask not if the dice are loaded, but if the 44 Magnum is.
Picture the clathrate gun hypothesis playing the role in Eli’s similes of bunnies playing with 44 Magnums. Go on click that link –but only if you’re prepared for the possibilities of loosing sleep.
On second thoughts, you will lose sleep.
So let me state this: it is now pointless wrangling over the question of whether or not to attribute individual events to climate change.
Reality makes that debate redundant.
We’re here: we’ve arrived at the point in history when our species has engineered a new climate. The point we knew was coming – that was inevitable – if we did nothing.
Slouching towards the Anthropocene
Let’s recap the past few months shall we?
The North American heat wave with 40,000 temperature records broken; six million displaced in India due to monsoon rains, 150 dead in Russia as several months worth of rain falls in a matter of hours; Arctic and Greenland ice loss…
Need I go on?
It’s unfolding as if climate change was real… funny that huh?
I was going to muse on what this all means, but I’ve already did that in August 2010 in the post “Welcome to the Anthropocene”:
Being a blogger frees me from the usual reticence and qualified statements scientists usually (for good reason) make.
I may appear very foolish for saying this, but its time to call it: we’ve well and truly passed a threshold.
Call it climate change, or global warming. Or perhaps you could rename the planet as Bill McKibben suggests (Eaarth). Actually the name really doesn’t matter.
This is the new normal.
Even if we stopped all CO2 emissions tomorrow, there’s more than enough warming “in the pipe” for future “climate disruption”.
The Greenland ice sheet?
Most likely gone.
The Great Barrier Reef.
Most likely gone.
2010 is the year in which the climate news is getting worse: hottest year on record; the ocean’s phytoplankton dying off; the Russian heat wave; the floods in Pakistan (2).
Welcome to the anthropocene.
That’s the thing about the climate change debate. You end up saying the same thing over, and over again. Though who listens is another question…
Famously, one scientist called the climate an angry beast, and that our activities are provoking it. Permit me to run with that metaphor and repurpose the final lines of “The Second Coming” by W.B. Yeats:
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards the Bethlehem to be born?
And what a beast climate change is: slowly, almost methodically it slouches into perception and our lives.
There will come a time when all of us will be forced to stare into face of the beast, aghast and transfixed, like Saturn’s sons staring into the gaping maw of their father.