Pete.Ridley@fsmail.net is the presumed cyberstalker

A “Peter Ridley” contacted my and made the claim that  nasty posts, cyber stalking etc. are the work of an “imposter” using the moniker “Pete Ridley”.

The details for cyber stalking “Pete Ridley” account are:

The following account:

Posted this on my blog:

It sounds about right, considering the nonsense you have posted here. If that is you then “Mindfulness in the midst of chaos” says it all. Next time I’m visiting friends in Brighton I’ll pop along to the Maitreya Kadampa Buddhist Centre in Bexhill on Sea for a chat. Is it still Sea Road?

BTW, do you have any scientific or engineering education or training or was it all theology and meditation?

Best wishes, Pete Ridley

Clearly indicating they could get to a reader of this blog.

Let me be clear: this email account is banned permanently without any further consideration.

Will the “real” Peter stand up?

There is another email account that the “real” Peter Ridley claims to speak through:

peter.ridley@fsmail.net

I was approached by this “Peter” using the later account claiming “Pete” was an “impostor”. Both use email accounts with the fsmail.net extension. fsmail.net is the portal to web mail services for telecommunications company Orange (UK).

To be frank, if it is an imposter then “Peter” should contact the ISP and let them know of the confusion.

Final say

Message to the supposed “imposter” Pete Ridley, you can f___ off mate.

Message to the “real” Peter Ridley, sort it out with your ISP. If it is an “imposter” then identify theft is a crime. That is for you to sort out, not me or anyone else on the internet should have to fix.

Take the time of look at the following:

All comments from “Peter” will be held in spam and will only be let through after careful scrutiny.

The “real Peter” may think this unfair. It is not censorship, this is about protecting me and my readers.

That’s it, I’m not wasting anymore of my life on this.

About these ads

127 thoughts on “Pete.Ridley@fsmail.net is the presumed cyberstalker

  1. Ian Worrall says:

    Unfortunately once you’re a victim it can be very difficult to clear your name

  2. john byatt says:

    Ridley said ” i cannot stand cowards that hide behind fase names like spatch and cooloola , me and my buddies ADMRICH and POPTECH and many others cannot abide by this, geoff did you ever post under the very uncowardly name of HAVEQUESTIONS because you ask the same questions,

    he has lost the plot

  3. john byatt says:

    Here is gavin schmidt NASA answering a similar question about the jones data as elsa

    [Response: As an example of misconstruing almost every available fact, this comment rates high. Given that all of the relevant data and code related to this have been available for years, and yet the mono-maniacal desire to find something (anything!) wrong continues unabated, it is clear to any objective party that this continued harassment has nothing to do with science or climate or data or replication, but everything to do with partisan personal attacks. - gavin]

  4. john byatt says:

    I think elsa’s question is “what has caused temperature changes in the past”

    I would think that people claiming that the climate always changes would have some idea of that before coming here?

    seeing that your lot claim that elsa, you should explain it, i am only interested in this particular change due to emissions of CO2 fossil fuel use,

    try to keep on track

  5. elsa says:

    “what is this tangent that you have gone off on now? What on earth are you asking now ?”

    Well the answer to the question that I have asked you time and again is still outstanding John. You may diverge by talking about tangents, being rude etc etc. But if you can’t answer the question ( or even try to answer it!) your claim to know that CO2 drives global warming cannot stand.

    • john byatt says:

      “being rude”

      I am not being wude to woger elsa, i wonce had a pet worm and i weally woved him , i am transwerring my affection for my worm to woger because my worm got squished and his name was wobert .

      oh woe

  6. elsa says:

    “Phil Jones data has always been on the web”

    I don’t think that anyone disputes that SOME of Phil Jones’s data is and always has been available on the net. But it took a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain the bits that he didn’t want to show.

    • john byatt says:

      The bits were the private data elsa that jones had no authority to release ,
      they were not his property

      but i see that we are getting somewhere with your above acknowledgement

      No the freedom of information requests did not release that data, they had to pay for it

  7. john byatt says:

    Abbott debates Abbott, dont think that he put it in writing though

    http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/09/climate-change-cage-match-abbott-debates-abbott/

  8. john byatt says:

    Re Phil Jones email

    this is a perfect example of what happens when one reads a converstion between two people and jumps to a conclusion based on their ignorance of the context,

    SPATCH
    Remember this – Porn links posted on Fielding’s website.
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/23/2853599.htm

    I’m amazed that Pete hasn’t linked that to me yet. It was a simple and effective way to shut the forum down, albeit temporarily.*

    It was shut down permanently in the end though. I won’t divulge how that was done here though. *wink*

    *I’m not saying that I had anything to do with the porn links on Fielding’s site.

    I knew what spatch was saying , Geoff at TCS read that then put up a post that spatch had posted the porn on fieldings forum ,

    This is exactly what has happened due to the emails , idiots jumping to conclusions about things they do not understand the context of ,

    Thanks for the example geoff

    • Spatch says:

      Geoff fell for the trap I set hook line and sinker.

      I’ll break it down line by line.

      “I’m amazed that Pete hasn’t linked that to me yet. ”

      Pete’s accused me of many things – I was just saying I’m amazed he hasn’t accused me of the porn links yet.

      “It was a simple and effective way to shut the forum down, albeit temporarily.”

      That’s true, it did shut the forum down for a while so they could look for any more porn links.

      “It was shut down permanently in the end though.”

      Yep, Fielding pulled the plug on the forum, probably cos he lost the staff that was moderating it after he lost the election.

      “I won’t divulge how that was done here though. *wink*”

      That’s just me joking around – hence the *wink*

      Thanks for the laugh Geoff by falling for it then making it into a post on your moronic denier blog. What a goose!

  9. elsa says:

    “elsa the reference site is the Phil Jones site that contains the data that you keep claiming is unavailable”

    I don’t think I made any comment about data that was unavailable. I said Phil Jones was reluctant in the past to show his data to those opposed to his point of view. I don’t think that is a matter for debate, we all know it as a fact from the leaked e-mails.

    • elsa says:

      Unless of course by “unavailable data” you mean an answer to my question about how you have been able to disentangle the effects of the various factors that have caused temperature changes in the past. This is not answered by the link, nor I note by you now. I would always welcome your explanation on that front but I guess for now you are still unable to provide it.

      • john byatt says:

        Phil Jones data has always been on the web , it was also available at NOAA, M & M had the Phil Jones data at the time of the FOIs, they were after data that was covered by copyright, private data belonging to institutions that charged for access, Jones had no authority to give out that data, is there anything at all that you understand ? and what is this tangent that you have gone off on now? What on earth are you asking now ?

  10. john byatt says:

    I looked at Geoff’s attempt at maths on the forum, i left it alone felt a bit sorry for him,

    along comes someone and dumps on him , I think that he is the treasurer of the TCS, left that alone also, not a good look when the treasurer does not understand %

  11. john byatt says:

    The trick is rather than replying to a post, do up a new post addressing what has been presented below, I see that geoff picked up someone on his icebreaker for sale/ice age link from my post re that,

  12. john byatt says:

    Mike or CC, here is a post for you to expose , an appeal by the TCS to waste as much energy as possible for an hour,

    http://www.conservative.org.au/human-achievement-hour.html

    as linked at the Climate kleptics

  13. john byatt says:

    read you at unleashed spatch, had been waiting for Cox with a baseball bat ,

    .

    • Spatch says:

      I just did a quick drive by. You got plenty of swings in though.

      This comment at jo nova’s made me laugh:

      “OK went and did my bit posting a couple of replies. Got depressed and had to come back to this site for some sustenance!”

      Cox & the deniers are copping a hammering.

  14. elsa says:

    “What an utter load of crap. You’ve just displayed a complete lack of understanding of the peer review system. I’d quit now before you further embarrass yourself.”

    Like Mr Byatt you prefer insults to pointing out the fault in the logic. I think that in any other science a review that was carried out by somebody who completely shared your own point of view would be considered unlikely to advance things further. There is a 99% chance that they would find your paper superb. What really counts is if you can get someone who is opposed to you to review your work and comment. Even if you do not agree on much you can at least try to isolate the areas of difference so that you see which the areas are that need to be concentrated on to resolve disputes/advance knowledge. How would you propose to do it?

    That Phil Jones is against showing his data to people opposed to his views says a great deal about his whole approach to science.

    • Spatch says:

      If you’d clicked on the link that John posted you’d have all the data that you incorrectly claim is being suppressed.

      As for your continuing lack of understanding of the peer review process, you’ve gone and effectively removed yourself from any rational debate on climate science. Get back to me when you’ve got that part figured out.

      • elsa says:

        “As for your continuing lack of understanding of the peer review process”

        Perhaps since I am so stupid you could explain it to me. You seem to think that peer review ought to comprise person A, who agrees with person B, reviewing person B’s work. That is fine so far as it goes (which is not that far) but is clearly not as effective as someone who does not agree with person B reviewing person B’s work.

      • elsa says:

        I did not make a claim that data was being suppressed, I said that Phil Jones had been reluctant to disclose information in the past, which he has. That is not the mark of someone who likes to submit his work to genuine peer review (as opposed to a review by your mates which you seem to think counts for more). Given that the UK tax payer had financed his work it was especially unhelpful of him.

    • john byatt says:

      elsa the reference site is the Phil Jones site that contains the data that you keep claiming is unavailable,

      sorry but the only conclusion is that you are either just a troll trying to annoy by claiming ignorance, or you are actually ignorant,

      all of your future posts will be ignored unless they contain something that is worth responding to,

  15. elsa says:

    While I would not say that the average high school teacher is more qualified than Phil Jones I suspect there are many that are. His scientific training seems to have been limited. I don’t know of Taguchi, so I can’t comment on him. The number of papers published and peer reviewed seems to have become a new way of testing science in the warmist world. Peer review ought to mean reviewed by someone who does not agree with you. Getting someone who holds the same views as you is not a test. We know where Phil Jones stands on this. He is not at all keen to release his data because it might be investigated by those who don’t agree with him, as he has confirmed in his e-mails. Yet it is only by exposing your data and work to those who do not agree with you that you can really test that work.

  16. peteridley says:

    Hi Elsa, you will not get any worthwhile science out of John Byatt. You may be lucky and avoid his nasty side because he is using his real name now rather than hiding behind a false one, but watch out. He is quite liable to come back in another guise and wait for the language. On Fielding’s blog he (as “cooloola”), Ross Brisbane (as “DigitalAdvisor”/”ConcernedCitizen”) and “Spatch” were known as either “the duty dingbats” r “the three stoogies”. Disruption and invective was their game, pure and simple.

    I always made and still make allowances for Ross because he can’t help himself, but John and (still cowardly) “Spatch” are the pits.

    If you want to have a sensible debate with intelligent people I recommend that you pay a visit to Professor Judith Curry’s blog. In particular I recommend Roger Taguchi’s contributions on her “Physics of the atmospheric greenhouse(?) effect” (http://judithcurry.com/2010/11/30/physics-of-the-atmospheric-greenhouse-effect/#comment-51187). See his postings on 7th, 9th & 22nd Feb.

    Judith is a “luke-warmer” not a CACC disciple like Mike here so you can have sensible exchanges there. You’ll never get it here. If the “duty dingbats” pay her a visit and try to disrupt her blog she’ll give them short shrift.

    Mike, thanks for restoring my “privilege” to comment. Several on your blog (especially ecologist Timothy) grumble on about the damage that humans are doing to the environment. I’ve reminded you before of the ways in which humans have improved the environment for the benefit of humans. We should be grateful for these anthropognic changes. Enjoy this wonderful world that we live in and continue to enjoy all of the benefits that humans have made possible through their ingenuity, including the fantastic improvements that they have made to the environment and our access to places of natural beauty. These are pleasures that people living 150 years ago in the developed world couldn’t even dream of and for the present day inhabitants of undeveloped nations still can’t imagine ..”. CACC “disciples” like you, Tim and Andrew moan on about the damage that humans are doing to the planet but you are choosing to ignore all of the great improvements that they have made for the benefit of the most important of all species, we humans.

    Let me give you an example. There is a large area (187 square km) in the UK “ .. The Norfolk Broads, an area of great natural beauty and a haven for wildlife .. ” (http://www.leboat.co.uk/destination/england/norfolk_broads) that my family, friends and 2 million others love to visit in the summer. It is as lovely as the holiday brochures paint it, easily accessed thanks to human inginuity and full of natural and human-made beauty. How did it come about? “ .. It is ironic that one of the greatest areas of natural beauty and wildlife conservation in Britain is in essence man-made. Located in the quadrant to the north and east of Norwich , the Broads are the shallow lakes formed when ancient peat-diggings were flooded because of a rise in water levels in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. .. ” (http://www.information-britain.co.uk/famous/NorfolkBroads).

    “The origins of these Broads was not known until very recently as everyone just assumed they were shallow naturally formed lakes which were simply related to the surrounding and interconnecting rivers. In fact they were all man made many hundreds of years ago .. in fact they were all medieval peat diggings dating back mostly to the 12-14th century .. ” (http://www.norfolk-broads.com/about_the_broads/index.php). Read some more about how humans have improved the environment for the benefit of humans.

    BTW, what is peat – oh yes, an early form of “fossil fuel”!

    That reminds me of the story about the old gardener and the vicar.
    Vicar: “You and God have made a wonderful job of that garden”
    Gardener “ Well, you should have seen the mess it was in before I took over.
    The world is now a far nicer place for humans to live in than it was before we cut down those dense forests, introduced agriculture, roads, wonderful means of transport, hospitals, schools, etc. etc. etc.

    OK, we’ve done some damage on the way but we learn from our mistakes and eventually put things right. What we must strive to do is help underdeveloped economies to achieve the same comfortable environments and lifestyles that we take for granted but they can only aspire to and help them to learn from our past mistakes.

    Best regards, Pete Ridley

    • Spatch says:

      Ridley said:
      “If you want to have a sensible debate with intelligent people I recommend that you pay a visit to Professor Judith Curry’s blog. In particular I recommend Roger Taguchi’s contributions on her “Physics of the atmospheric greenhouse(?) effect” (http://judithcurry.com/2010/11/30/physics-of-the-atmospheric-greenhouse-effect/#comment-51187). See his postings on 7th, 9th & 22nd Feb.

      Taguchi said on Curry’s blog
      “In any previous discussion mentioning backscatter, I goofed.”

      “I also goofed in my posting of Feb. 2, 2011 at 1:13 am, when I derived a value for temperature sensitivity (not corrected for IPCC truncation error)of 1.02 instead of the correct value of 0.70. I should have used the power output of 343 W/m^2 at the Earth’s surface rather than the value of 260 W/m^2 at altitude. ”

      “That’s what happens when you blindly substitute into a formula without truly understanding the physics.”

      ————–

      “without truly understanding the physics”

      ————–

      That about sums up Taguchi.

      He should go read a few climate science text books.

    • john byatt says:

      john byatt (03:02:00) :
      Ridley said ” i cannot stand cowards that hide behind fase names like spatch and cooloola , me and my buddies ADMRICH and POPTECH and many others cannot abide by this, geoff did you ever post under the very uncowardly name of HAVEQUESTIONS because you ask the same questions,

      he has lost the plot

      Reply

  17. john byatt says:

    spatch

    and colin dixon, seemed to have really off the planet scientific opinions,
    at last revealed’

    seems that he was a devotee of don tolman and his boot camp for brains

    “whatever you believe is fact’

    http://www.dontolmanstore.com/index.php?main_page=products_all

  18. john byatt says:

    Just to help with all this confusion of the blog names

    spatch has always been spatch and only spatch

    ross has also only been two names, not mentioned due security

    John byatt , me was cooloola , banned by moderator,after a few months ??

    came back next day as phoenix ( risen from the ashes} , everyone including PR knew because it was in my post, “Did i really fool ya spatch?’

    again we were all banned after a few months .

    came back this time as guess who and again they all were told straight away

    now if i was posting as cooloola at the time then cooloola was used elsewhere,
    so there was no confusion when i posted as phoenix then i used that elsewhere
    ridley knew all this but because steve’s blog was taken down then he probably thinks that no one can check so he can claim anything,

    spatch has now put up the archive so pete’s absurd claims can be checked

    Didnt see that coming ridley

    the reason for this is that the false pete ridley is an extremely weird sociopath that has caused concern to many people

    ,

  19. Spatch says:

    One of my favourite moments was when we outed the truth behind the “award winning” scientist that Pete kept promoting all over the blogosphere – Roger Taguchi.

    It was such a hard fall back to earth for poor old Pete when we discovered that his hero Taguchi was merely a retired high school science teacher – and the “award” he received was a gold star from the school principal.

    (The unanswered question is whether Pete knew that or if he was mislead by Taguchi.)

    It was even funnier when Taguchi came on Fielding’s blog and admitted, after we’d outed him, that he’d never read a climate science text book – which came as no surprise to us. lol

    • john byatt says:

      Taguchi has the claim that from CO2 alone then doubling would give a temp rise of 1DegC,

      no problem as this is close to the IPCC 1.1DegC and the newer 1.2DegC

      even pete has post “from CO2 alone”, Taguchi did come onto fieldings blog and debate Tom, maybe it was actually pete because on other blogs pete usually replies ” i will email roger and get back ”

      Taguchi seems to be in the equal negative and positive feedback camp that would prevented climate change in the past , climate change in the past happened so feedbacks cannot be neutral

      TCS had Cox there last week claiming that the warming is due to TSI , today they are posing the possible return of the little ice age , again no doubt to reduced TSI,

      Elsa, okay ask one question at a time here, if it is not completely stupid then someone may help, dont think that will happen though as mothincarnate has given up on you due to your lack of comprehension

      ,

    • elsa says:

      And why could a retired high school teacher not be a knowledgeable and clever person with something useful to say on this subject? Do you have something against high school teachers? Why would they not be better placed than eg Phil Jones, with his degree from that top UK science university, Lancaster, which just happens not to teach dreary subjects such as physics which might have got in the way of his own brand of “science”?

      • Spatch says:

        Apart from the fact that Professor Phil Jones is an actual climate scientist who has published over 100 papers in the scientific literature and has won numerous awards ( real proper awards for his work in climate science, not gold stars from some lowly ranked high school) there’s not that much difference between him and Taguchi.

        I look forward to reading Taguchi’s work once he’s been published.

        http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/people/facstaff/jonesp

  20. elsa says:

    “the point was elsa , you all ask the same questions, you expect us to explain the science to you, this is your job, if you cannot understand the science by now then i guess that you never will”

    I have never seen the main question that I asked of you asked by anyone else on this site. I suggest that you just can’t answer it.

    I think you should explain the science to us, not the other way round, since it is you that is making the claim to know so much.

    • john byatt says:

      Elsa it is only after reading the science for over two years that you realise just how little you know, you having never read it believe that you have some absurd questions that has the scientists stumped,

      Atheist blogs have “fanasty island for the YECYS
      RC has the “bore hole’
      another is the dunces corner
      we need ” what elsa would you like to ask’

      • elsa says:

        Would it not be easier just to answer the question than to try to tell me what I might or might not have read? Be careful orreaders may realise that you can’t answer it.

  21. john byatt says:

    I forgot all about the flying binghi and his appeal to history ,

    I learnt a lot on fieldings blog as you were continually being exposed to the latest final nail in the coffin self contradictions , so from that i now know all the sceptic arguments.

    that one day they posted Miskolczi and claimed his science as correct then the next day Spencer , this contradiction to miskolczi did not seem to produce a cognitive dissonance in them, they were capable of accepting both no greenhouse at the same time as accepting greenhouse with less sensitivity,
    they would claim that the warming was natural then the next day claim that it was cooling, denier or denialist does not reveal where the madness lie

  22. Spatch says:

    Ah yes – that was all really strange – I really felt sorry for Chris having the lunatics invade his blog like that.

    If you’re feeling nostalgic check this out. It’s a snapshot of the entire Steve Fielding forum. It’s all there – the post with my location details is there too – wonder how long it will take for Pete to find it…

    http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20100827001415/http://www.stevefielding.com.au/forums/viewforum/13/

  23. john byatt says:

    Remember spatch, this absurdity that they went on with at chris’s blog

    Peggyb a rabid sceptic turns up, obviously not her but pete does not even question that and just replies as if it was the real peggyb,

    comments follow on from here

    http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/2009/12/18/richard-alley-at-agu-2009-the-biggest-control-knob/#comment-2091

  24. john byatt says:

    remember Pip, went to that Monckton lecture and could not get out of the place fast enough, Pip was probably the only one their with a bit of a clue, wonder if he has worked it out yet?

    ridley asked geoff at TCS if he was Havequestions because he asked the same questions, Note to pete, so does elsa,

    seems that HQ was not that mad that he got into the ridley email gang
    I see that riddles blog still has monkeybumface as a friend, why?

    The best time i had there was when you were away spatch and poop talk turned up , invited by admin, after a day pooptalk started postng in ulta huge red capitals, lost the plot after a bit of brain surgery from cooloola ,
    he is also in the ridley email gang ,

    Sad that that site closed down, hehehehe I notice that Carter at TCS uses the same temperature graph as fielding did, the one with the trend excluded,
    why do they all fall for that,?

    it appears that apathy rather than denial is the real problem though, more information about the risks need to be disseminated.

    just preparing a letter regarding the, Tragedy of the commons ,

    sometimes go to ABC unleashed when Cox or one of the IPA, Lavoisier goons are there, a new shining light Lisa merideth has appeared, excellent short explanations, very patient,

    • elsa says:

      Note to John Byatt: I don’t know if I have asked the same questions as others. I can assure you that I am me and only me on this site. I am not Roger or any other person. I also know that you have not answered the questions that I asked which are fundamental to your belief in the causes of global warming. So go on, answer the questions instead of ducking them by changing the subject.

      • john byatt says:

        the point was elsa , you all ask the same questions, you expect us to explain the science to you, this is your job, if you cannot understand the science by now then i guess that you never will

        so please change my reply, to “rubbish questions’

  25. john byatt says:

    Spatch got his own tag at TCS at least he called you spatchcock instead of that filthy frank that put up the urban dictionary version {fielding forum}

    have let geoff know about that russian porn site stuff , it was there for weeks as it was written in russian, we all reported it but the moderator was never there , someone got sick of it and reported it , north tasmanian man, so no one from the forum

    wonder what was on the porn site, ? i thought they were selling iphones

    • Spatch says:

      I ran some of that Russian porn stuff thru google translate and it was links to hard core adult and kiddy porn. Nasty stuff.

      What made me laugh was that we were getting flack from the site admin for minor infringements – a few harmless insults – usually in response to insults from the deniers – and all the while kiddie porn was sitting there for weeks right under the admins noses!

      Ahh yes, good ole chugg and the “shining ones”. ridley’s madness is the irritating type but chuggs was extremely funny.

      • john byatt says:

        and the flaming chugg list of every undersea volcano on the planet , page after stuffin page of it , was rolling on the floor by the time he finished,

        then the list of every bloody glacier on earth ,

        The day he lost the plot and posted all the alien stuff , i felt a bit sorry for him ,

  26. john byatt says:

    found this as an alert moderator, please remove at ABC

    “I cant help putting the boot in here is one sceptic and little green men” poster from fieldings forum, as i say pulled down if you want more,
    google peggyb, al gore the antichrist, steve fielding

    Forums :: Senator Steve Fielding
    15 posts – 7 authors – Last post: 25 Apr
    Wonder how long before chugg climbs out of the bunker to give …. But no need to worry,Enki/Jesus and his Shining Ones I’m sure will be …
    http://www.stevefielding.com.au/forums/viewthread/553/P135

    old chugg, barry the bunker baron, cannot find his blog about the shining ones,
    they were all stuffing crazy

  27. john byatt says:

    I rarely speak to the boss nowadays best to keep a bit of distance ,

  28. Spatch says:

    Yep, then there were the Shanghai conferences – Maurice Strong – Carbon Taxes – it’s all coming together nicely as we said it would…

  29. john byatt says:

    the dumbo , i have been using my real name on the web, re climate change since 2007 ,
    after there were some leon ashby and viv forbes letters to the editor in the local paper that i replied to i started to receive sceptic propaganda in the mail,

    googled john byatt gympie times and one of the locals had asked if someone could reply to a letter from our local vocal alarmist john byatt.

    it was on the Agmates blog now just grounds, ross was posting on there so just went on to give him a bit of moral support ,

  30. I also found Pelejero, 2010 “Paleo-perspectives on ocean acidification”.
    Both abstracts reveal Pelejero is more concerned about it than the WUWT interpretation… go figure.

    Thanks for the info and letting me distract from the conversation and I’ll check those links.

    I’d sign my first name but, it’s got a bad rap on this thread ;-) P.M.

    • john byatt says:

      there is all the guff waiting in moderation

    • john byatt says:

      go to real climate whack Pelejero 2005 into the search bar , i think that it was comment around 86 in the first link , mike not be back for a while

  31. john byatt says:

    Pete “I was doing an update to a document about an Australian coward (John Byatt) who, from behind the “obscurity” of the false name “cooloola”, hurled insults at anyone who dared to express sceptical opinions in the blogosphere about the UN-inspired propaganda of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change (CACC).”

    he is good value

  32. john byatt says:

    Just like a scene from yes minister, wink wink , nod nod

  33. john byatt says:

    Spatch i also remember you heading off to china with Brian brown after that film he made “logcabin in sheffield”, for the expo ,

    remember that i posted ” i think that this blog will close soon , it was fun CC and spatch, all the best see ya ” and i think it was only a week or two later.

    have a look at that imjustsharing link above, he is working on the john byatt document , flipdick

  34. Spatch says:

    Back onto the very entertaining topic of Pete’s descent into madness – I notice that he’s hell bent on finding out my identity.

    This will drive him nuts – I posted info about my location in a conversation with cooloola on Fieldings blog – there’s no way he’ll ever find that post now…

    Remember this – Porn links posted on Fielding’s website.
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/23/2853599.htm

    I’m amazed that Pete hasn’t linked that to me yet. It was a simple and effective way to shut the forum down, albeit temporarily.*

    It was shut down permanently in the end though. I won’t divulge how that was done here though. *wink*

    *I’m not saying that I had anything to do with the porn links on Fielding’s site.

  35. john byatt says:

    trying to pull it all together CC,

    for this particular coral and its past term survival, subject to the nuances of this particular reef (Flinders} then the change to ocean ph has not yet exceeded the normal inter decadal Ph changes that are within its normal range

    now put it into english and make up a post?

  36. john byatt says:

    citing papers in the search bar at RC sometimes yields results as below

    The paper you cite (Pelejero 2005) does not go as far as you think it does. It discusses the response of one species of coral in one reef. It does not discount the seriousness of the acidification problem.

    Read Pelejero’s own take on the problem
    http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU05/04277/EGU05-J-04277.pdf

    The Pelejero 2005 is in Science, but its available in a non-subscription version
    http://pangea.stanford.edu/research/Oceans/GES205/Pelejero_Science_Preindustrial%20to%20Modern%20Interdecadal%20Variability.pdf

  37. john byatt says:

    yes it looks like a cherry pick of one test site but without being able to access full papers it is a bit hard to say,

    paper was cited for this absract so it does not sound to good for the deniers,

    Increasing global concentrations of atmospheric CO2 are predicted to decrease ocean pH, with potentially severe impacts on marine food webs, but empirical data documenting ocean pH over time are limited. In a high-resolution dataset spanning 8 years, pH at a north-temperate coastal site declined with increasing atmospheric CO2 levels and varied substantially in response to biological processes and physical conditions that fluctuate over multiple time scales. Applying a method to link environmental change to species dynamics via multispecies Markov chain models reveals strong links between in situ benthic species dynamics and variation in ocean pH, with calcareous species generally performing more poorly than noncalcareous species in years with low pH. The models project the long-term consequences of these dynamic changes, which predict substantial shifts in the species dominating the habitat as a consequence of both direct effects of reduced calcification and indirect effects arising from the web of species interactions. Our results indicate that pH decline is proceeding at a more rapid rate than previously predicted in some areas, and that this decline has ecological consequences for near shore benthic ecosystems.

  38. john byatt says:

    Bingo The Abstract and other abstracts of comments one was the one above

    http://www.sciencemag.org/content/309/5744/2204.abstract

  39. john byatt says:

    Always ask for a link CC, Some read something at a denier site which might only give an abstract and just make up stuff knowing that none of the choir will go and have a look, this was typical of the pinker et al 2005, paper,

    they get away with it for a while but the time has got her pants on they are on to something else

    you know all that though CC

  40. john byatt says:

    more ,

    [PDF] Response to Comment on“Preindustrial to Modern Interdecadal …
    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – Quick View
    by C Pelejero – Cited by 4 – Related articles
    served in Flinders Reef, based on our high- resolution coral d11B data [figure 2C in (2)]. …. 3Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National …
    web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~bmcneil/publications/Pelejero.response.pdf

  41. john byatt says:

    Here, others may wish to have a read

    http://www.desdemonadespair.net/search/label/coral

  42. elsa says:

    John,
    Would be interested to receive your comments on the reply that i posted for you earlier today elsewhere on this site.

  43. This is way off topic, but it might be refreshing too. I’m sharing it because it appears this is along the great barrier reef, I was wondering if any of you folks have some information. It could make for a great post. eh ;-)
    cheers.

    A WUWT fan linked me to:
    Ocean Acidification: Chicken Little of the Sea Strikes Again
    Posted on January 10, 2011
    ~ ~ ~
    “Flinders Reef calcification”
    “The calcification rate of Flinders Reef has increased along with atmospheric CO2 concentrations since 1700…”

    “As the atmospheric CO2 concentration has grown since the 1700′s coral reef extension rates have also trended upwards. This is contrary to the theory that increased atmospheric CO2 should reduce the calcium carbonate saturation in the oceans, thus reducing reef calcification. It’s a similar enigma to the calcification rates of coccoliths and otoliths.”

    “When, in fact, the opposite is occurring in nature with reefs and coccoliths – Calcification rates are generally increasing. And in empirical experiments under laboratory conditions, otoliths grew (rather than shrank) when subjected to high levels of simulated atmospheric CO2.”

    • john byatt says:

      its a bit cherry picked, for instance at Tuvalu the coral is growing in response to SLR, AIMS AUST INSTITUTE MARINE SCIENCE, GBR MARINE PARK AUTHORITY Are good sources for info, also go to Desdemona despair and click onto the coral reef pages, lots of up to date stuff linked to papers etc,

      Ove had a press release recently read it but forgot where, could have been at Des,

      Have not read them elsa but put me down as “rubbish” as a reply

  44. john byatt says:

    Hope that pete gets his document up on his blog soon, i could sure use another house in the UK,

    I was doing an update to a document about an Australian coward (John Byatt) who, from behind the “obscurity” of the false name “cooloola”, hurled insults at anyone who dared to express sceptical opinions in the blogosphere about the UN-inspired propaganda of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change (CACC). He did this in collaboration with two other Austrlians, one named Ross Brisbane (AKA DigitalAdvisor/ConcernedCitizen) who can be excused a little because of personal problems and another equally vicious individual (who used Spatch/Phoenix/Guess-who/etc. and impersonated LordMonckton/Colin/PeggyB/Stormboy and Pete Ridley).

  45. john byatt says:

    I think that it is worse than Dementia,
    15th feb Pete,…..have you any info on john byatt (cooloola), after ABC comment

    15Th geoff, here is his address,,,,,,,

    23Feb Pete , I have managed to track down John byatt (cooloola} address at………

  46. john byatt says:

    No here it was

    The Climate Sceptics (TCS) Blog: True Unbelievers
    Feb 15, 2011
    Anonymous said… Pete, Don’t forget that Cooloola indicated being actively involved/engaged with the Australian Greens & manned a polling booth on the last elections last year for them. Admrich. February 20, 2011 10:43 PM …
    http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com/
    1

  47. john byatt says:

    i think this is the one where ADMRICH appears out of nowhere

    http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com/2011/02/wathing-realdeniers-deny-science-and.html

  48. Spatch says:

    The silly old git is clearly suffering from dementia.

    His recollection of what happened at Fielding’s site is completely wrong. He’s mixed our user names up and forgotten about Admrich’s antics which backfired hilariously on him.

  49. Spatch says:

    Ahahhaa! That was a hoot! This line cracked me up:

    “and another equally vicious individual (who used Spatch/Phoenix/Guess-who/etc. and impersonated LordMonckton/Colin/PeggyB/Stormboy and Pete Ridley).”

    His memory of what happened over at Fielding’s blog is all over the shop. Not only has Pete lost his marbles, his memory is gone as well. Poor fellow, he’s clearly suffering from dementia.

    Is Mike aware of Pete’s ultimatum?

    “Mike has so far refused to provide those details while insisting that I had sent it (which I had not) so I have given him until 6th March, otherwise I shall be complaining to the local (UK) police about his Internet libel rather than my preferred complant against the childish and cowardly person who impersonated me.”

    I’d like to be a fly on the wall when Pete makes the complaint to the local police. They’ll probably call in the men in white coats to come and take him away.

    • john byatt says:

      I still cannot see the problem , mike has said that there was a false impersonating cyber stalker ridley and has blocked that IP, The heading even states that

      if mike thought that they were one and the same then ridley would not have been able to post, mike said he can and he has,

      I just curious how pete worked out using times that it was not him

      • Spatch says:

        It’s obvious that whoever the other Pete is he’s based in the UK.

        As a test I just tried to sign up with @fsmail.net and I couldn’t because my IP address is not allowed to access to fsmail.net

        I’m not sure but that’s probably because my IP address is Australian?

        http://web.orange.co.uk/p/email/help_signing_in_to_email

        “If you are having problems signing in to your @fsmail.net email account try the links below for help.

        Lost or forgotten your password?

        Sign up for an email account
        http://webmailregistration.orange.co.uk/registration/add_details.jsp
        (try it yourself – click on this link)

        let us know if it lets you sign up or if you get the same message I do:

        “Sorry you are not allow to registrer free email account.
        The reason is: Your IP address is not allowed to access
        to fsmail.net registration website.”

        Pete’s accused me of impersonating him. If I was then I guess I’m not alone as it looks like there’s a growing worldwide group of Pete impersonators – feeling a tad paranoid yet Pete?

  50. john byatt says:

    Classic, this was posted by one of the petes 2 MAR 2011
    he still is having nightmares about me, he seems to have moved onto claiming that mike in putting up the shenanigans blog linked to his email address is being naughty,

    http://www.imjustsharing.com/bloggers-cant-hide-behind-fake-names-anymore-and-defame-others/

    ross and spatch get a mention ,

  51. Pete Ridley says:

    Mike, thanks for restoring my “privilege” to comment but I refer you to my latest E-mail sent this morning (UK morning, not Australian) regarding your claim that “ .. Pete Ridley compared me to a pedophile: ..”.

    Leaving that matter until next week, let me remind you of a comment that I placed on your ““Climategate an act of cyber-terrorism? .. ” thread (http://watchingthedeniers.wordpress.com/2010/12/13/climategate-an-act-of-cyber-terrorism-us-knew-of-attacks-leading-to-climategate/#comments) on 2010_12_14. It made reference to another of your nonsensical statements about CACC that you made on Graham Wayne’s blog (http://gpwayne.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/cancun-how-could-i-not-be-wearily-cynical-about-this-abject-failure/#comment-846). Your nonsense that time was “ .. It was coal and steam that built the British Empire .. ” and you shied away from acknowledging that you were talking rubbish.

    On that thread your buddy Ti(Moth)y made the comment “ .. Pete, you’ve done 3yrs of independent ‘research’ (largely, and by your own admission, including grey literature that demonises environmental concern), which we’re suppose to care about, .. ”. Once again Tim had drawn the totally wrong conclusion. I have said before to Tim that he and I are not far apart regarding our opinions on protecting the environment .. ”.

    On Andrew Durling’s blog I recently commented “ .. Please, get real and enjoy this wonderful world that we live in and continue to enjoy all of the benefits that humans have made possible through their ingenuity, including the fantastic improvements that they have made to the environment and our access to places of natural beauty. These are pleasures that people living 150 years ago in the developed world couldn’t even dream of and for the present day inhabitants of undeveloped nations still can’t imagine ..”. CACC “disciples” like you, Tim and Andrew moan on about the damage that humans are doing to the planet but you are choosing to ignore all of the great improvements that they have made for the benefit of the most important specie, humans.

    Let me give you an example. There is a large area (187 square km) in the UK “ .. The Norfolk Broads, an area of great natural beauty and a haven for wildlife .. ” (http://www.leboat.co.uk/destination/england/norfolk_broads) that my family, friends and 2 million others love to visit in the summer. It is as lovely as the holiday brochures paint it, easily accessed thanks to human inginuity and full of natural and human-made beauty. How did it come about? “ .. It is ironic that one of the greatest areas of natural beauty and wildlife conservation in Britain is in essence man-made. Located in the quadrant to the north and east of Norwich , the Broads are the shallow lakes formed when ancient peat-diggings were flooded because of a rise in water levels in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. .. ” (http://www.information-britain.co.uk/famous/NorfolkBroads).

    “The origins of these Broads was not known until very recently as everyone just assumed they were shallow naturally formed lakes which were simply related to the surrounding and interconnecting rivers. In fact they were all man made many hundreds of years ago .. in fact they were all medieval peat diggings dating back mostly to the 12-14th century .. ” (http://www.norfolk-broads.com/about_the_broads/index.php). Read some more about how humans have improved the environment for the benefit of humans.

    BTW, what is peat – oh yes, an early form of “fossil fuel”!

    As I said in a comment that I submitted to the blog of Jo Abbess (yes, the same Abbess that Ian Ash linked to above QUOTE: That reminds me of the story about the old gardener and the vicar.
    Vicar: “You and God have made a wonderful job of that garden”
    Gardener “ Well, you should have seen the mess it was in before I took over.
    The world is now a far nicer place for humans to live in than it was before we cut down those dense forests, introduced agriculture, roads, wonderful means of transport, hospitals, schools, etc. etc. etc. (and even those lovely bars and the beer that Jo invited Claverton Energy Research Group to enjoy at Birbeck). OK, we’ve done some damage on the way but we learn from our mistakes and put things right. What we must strive to do is help underdeveloped economies to achieve the same comfortable environments and lifestyles that we take for granted but they can only aspire to and they should be able to learn from our mistakes UNQUOTE (http://www.joabbess.com/2010/10/13/the-messiah-with-us/).

    Best regards, Pete Ridley

    • john byatt says:

      Pete if the explanation of the times is so simple then post it now why do you need to leave it aside till next week, this rambling on about the Broads and old gardeners does not even seem to make any point whatsoever .

      the questions are , is it warming, yes
      is it due to AGW , yes
      Do we need to do something about it , yes
      does old stories about gardeners and the broads add to the debate , NO

  52. john byatt says:

    I just got banned at TCS for

    Do you understand any of this stuff that you post Geoff?
    followed by IPCC citation of Pinker,

    unacceptable words says geoff,

    i think that ross __B, who comes here got more than denier nonsense from that site, threats , so i never link D_ A to ross’s name on the blogs

  53. Spatch says:

    *shudder*

    It was fun going over there and kicking the ants nest. Then psycho bitch started to email me privately with her denier nonsense. I told her to #%#* off in the end which as you’d expect promptly got me blacklisted!

  54. john byatt says:

    PR was on TCS blog , when suddenly who should show up, they must email each other constantly,,

    just for spatch

    “I just checked in at Cafe Nano (UQ AIBN, Brisbane) on @footfeedapp
    about 3 hours ago via Footfeed”

    • Spatch says:

      Ah, the bus driver! lol. Jeeeez what a goose. good value but when he’d lose the plot and post page after page of denier tripe as though that was some sort of payback for making him angry – it just made me roflmao instead!

  55. john byatt says:

    After telling him that i was in the maroochydore, noosa ,gympie , fraser island region he gets on a blog and proclaims how smart he is by saying that i have managed to track HER down to the maroochydore,noosa,gympie, fraser island area , the TCS blog put up my address and phone number and i even gots me own tag there, again you don’t count Sou ,

  56. john byatt says:

    Spatch baby , cooloola here, wondered where you got to mate ,

    it will be like old times. wonder if one of the petes still think you are a uni student, ?

    • Spatch says:

      Poor old Pete, he’s probably been thru all the uni student blogs looking for any references to Spatch.

      He really has become unhinged of late. I like to think I played a small part in that. *evil grin*

  57. Spatch says:

    I got bored with Pete a while back and went looking for another chronic denier to pester with scientific facts. I found ROM on http://forum.weatherzone.com.au/ubbthreads.php/forums/20/1/Climate_and_Climate_Change

    I used the same tactics on him as I did with the deniers on Fielding’s blog and sure enough ROM imploded last night.

    http://forum.weatherzone.com.au/ubbthreads.php/topics/968133/Re_Interesting_news_articles_a#Post968133

    Another denier bite the dust! Mission accomplished.

  58. Spatch says:

    @john byatt – Were you Cooloola on Fieldings blog?

    I had a blast on that blog messing with Pete’s head.

  59. ianash says:

    Mike

    You have to read Bob Carter’s latest froth spewing at:

    http://www.quadrant.org.au/blogs/doomed-planet/2011/02/carbon-dioxide-tax-the-people-s-revolt

    and here

    http://www.quadrant.org.au/blogs/doomed-planet/2011/02/gillard-ignores-the-science

    At least he has finally owned up to his corporate allegiances – IPA lapdog!

    “Professor Bob Carter is a geologist, environmental scientist and Emeritus Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs.”

    “Emeritus Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs”…is there a lower place on the denier totem pole than this?

    • john byatt says:

      This is from Bob Carters rant at the TCS blog,

      with friends like Carter, who needs enemies?

      Most federal National MPs/Senators and probably a majority of Liberal ones understand that Green-IPCC-inspired AGW hysteria is a contrived issue. But they remain terrified of the “poison pill” aspect of arguing against AGW alarmism. That the alarmist-inclined Greg Hunt is still Liberal spokesman on climate (and known to be backed by Malcolm Turnbull and others) is also a very big political problem for the Coalition.

      The internal schism in the Coalition has, perhaps inevitably, resulted in an ineffectual and politically damaging “keep our heads below the parapet” approach, accompanied by the maintenance of a transparently irrational “half-pregnant” policy for reducing carbon dioxide emissions through means other than taxation or trading

  60. ianash says:

    Wow, this guy seriously needs to help…

  61. Ray says:

    Hey, a little off topic but did you “Watch” Anthony Watts at WUWT being named the first ever winner of the Best Science Blog category?

    http://2011.bloggi.es/#science

    Very telling perception of the publics view of global warming.

    Also please take the time to see Gavin mauled at http://judithcurry.com

  62. john byatt says:

    I have noticed a few places where poop talk puts up the comment

    PR email me at ,,,,,,,,,

    is this trying to give the impression that they are not playing sockpuppets previously arranged????

  63. john byatt says:

    Was just getting up to date at RC, came across this link to Poop Talk banging on about that Magazine E&E ,

    who should appear but the PR ,

    http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/poptarts-450-climate-change-denier-lies/#comment-8151

    ,

  64. john byatt says:

    I left a plug there for “watching the deniers”

  65. Pete_Ridley says:

    As I stated, I am letting some of Peter’s comments through. I hope this is resolved soon.

    Mike, in your E-mail to me of 27th Feb 27 2011, 12:51 AM you said “Peter, There is confusion, personally I want to see “Peter” on the boards. However, if it is a case of identify theft then it is actionable. Whoever is doing this can be called to account via the legal process. Defamation or identify theft. I will allow comments through, it is not a ban. But others are being stalked. So I will treat this with the utmost caution. With all due respect, the ball is on your court to fix. Please use any thing posted on my blog to support your claims. Mike”.

    I responded with “ .. as you well know, identity theft (like libel) is only actionable if it can be proven that it happened and who did it. Action is only taken when the theft or libel are serious and the use of my identity to create nuisance is not even serious in my eyes, simply extremely childish and cowardly. I can do nothing without the details of that comment you claim was sent to you in my name likening you to a paedophile. Without the gravatar and E-mail address details I can do nothing .. ”.

    I ask you again, please would you publish here, just like any other comment that has passed through moderation, the full text of that comment which you claimed on 6th Feb at 02:47:45 QUOTE: Let me clarify something here. Why did Pete get kicked from this blog? Pete Ridley compared me to a pedophile: “…You’re like a pedophile priest up on the dais calling everyone else an evil sinner .. UNQUOTE. For me to go to my local police with a complaint I need to be able to take a copy of that comment and the details of the account behind it. Without that vital information I would be wasting my time.

    The ball’s back in your court now. If you are genuine you will provide what I ask.

    I’ll also E-mail this to you in case it doesn’t get past your spam detector but I also remind you that I made the same point in my E-mail to you of 27th Feb @ 10:14 AM (but again note that this is UK time, not Melbourne – 27th @ 21.14? Maybe someone would like to explain to John Byatt the difference between an E-mail and a blog comment, as his comments of 26th at 22:04:48, 22:39:48 and 23:15:35 indicate that he needs help on it).

    Best regards, Pete Ridley

    • Watching the Deniers says:

      Peter – as promised I am letting stuff through.

      Everyone here has rallied around the “real” Peter and provided useful advise, inforamtion and support.

      But you do need to do this for yourself.

      Mike @ WtD

      • john byatt says:

        “I’ll also E-mail this to you in case it doesn’t get past your spam detector but I also remind you that I made the same point in my E-mail to you of 27th Feb @ 10:14 AM (but again note that this is UK time, not Melbourne – 27th @ 21.14?”

        if this is the thrust of the defence, it needs clarification

    • john byatt says:

      That is our boy, Cooloola was me , even when he was told still would not believe it , he was looking, searching cyberspace for a female,

      Had a good laugh when i read that .

  66. john byatt says:

    PESTBET.COM

    Lay your bets now

    Mulumbinby NSW 50 to 1
    Gold Coast QLD 5 to 1
    UK 1 to 1000

    “exactly where the emails come from.”

  67. ianash says:

    Just to save Peter Riley some time, I’ve contacted the Met Police Central e-crime Unit and advised them that someone is fraudulently impersonating him. No doubt they’ll catch the person responsible.

    • Watching the Deniers says:

      I’m standing back from the whole thing, and letting Peter/Pete sort it out.

      • ianash says:

        They were extremely helpful. I gave them the details of the email addresses in question. Apparently they can do some sort of checking with the ISP provider that nails down exactly where the emails come from.

        Hopefully that will get it sorted and Geoff will come back. The honour of his party is at stake!

  68. john byatt says:

    No not that bad just another tick in the box,

    cop this though global political shunanegoons, sorry can’t spell that word

    Best regards,
    Posted by Pete Ridley at 10:26
    4 comments:

    Andrew said…
    Pete, email me at

    populartechnology (at) gmail (dot) com

    Andrew

    30 May 2010 15:09

  69. john byatt says:

    I think that Geoffs confusion about censorship may stem from not realizing that first posters are held for approval, or some {threads} comments are held for approval,
    While those that have been posting here awhile go straight through ,

    • Watching the Deniers says:

      He also forgets this is a private blog… I can do as I please.

      I’m not part of the mainstream media, or a journalist. It is run for free by me outside my normal work and family commitments.

      However I’m committed to freedom of expression.

  70. Ross Brisbane says:

    I’d like to see Pete Ridley get out of jail with this one. He seems to emanate from two very close IP sources. Perhaps he could sort this out. Is someone getting on computer but wait those IP number are only a numeric six apart in difference?

    Where’s your credibility now! Will the real Pete stop the fake Pete?

    • Watching the Deniers says:

      Which is why I may allow comments from “Peter” through, as opposed to the “Pete”.

      As I said above, Peter needs to talk to his ISP and take charge of the situation. If it is a true case of identify theft, then he can take some steps.

      I’ve been presented with other evidence which may – I stress may – support the argument there is a “fake” Pete.

      However, I can’t do anything about that. “Peter” needs to action this. I can’t spend anymore time on this, and it comes to down to the “real Peter” taking charge.

      Personally, I’ve found the private communications with the “real Peter” personable and the “fake Peter” slightly off.

      If it is a case of identity theft, then I sincerely hope the “real Peter” can get this sorted. He is welcome to use the comments made here and elsewhere to support his case.

      Best of luck “Peter”.

  71. john byatt says:

    When i post on a blog thread comment, whether that be 8AM or 8PM the time shown is always the blog time , otherwise times would be all over the place

  72. john byatt says:

    So the nasty post was not put up yet Pete still knows that the times were different?

  73. john byatt says:

    Well peter is very clever, picked up that times were either UK or Australia

    The cyber stalking pete often referred to post times as a defence at steve fielding blog, Not sure now whether it is the real or imitation peter at TCS

    Subject: Twisting the Facts? Hi Mike, I have just had a look at the new thread you have posted “Pete.Ridley@fsmail.net is the presumed cyberstalker”. Why are you distorting the picture now? (I know that you are gullible so in the following be aware that some of the dates & times given are Australian and some UK.)

  74. john byatt says:

    Posted at TCS by the real pete ridley, the peter ridley one,

    I was recently banned from the “Watching the Deniers” blog (http://watchingthedeniers.wordpress.com/2011/02/05/pete-ridely-banned/#comment-3165) as a result of someone impersonating me and insulting the blog owner, Mike.

    I think that we should all help pete {peter} catch this impersonating,
    snot wipe sociopath, the clever buggar even has put up a false shenanigans blog as well,

    we are with you pete (peter}

  75. john byatt says:

    I will call him Peter from now on as a matter of courtesy ,

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 773 other followers

%d bloggers like this: